60
the exempted
should be specified
by
name instead
of
being determined
by a general rule.
I am unable to agree in his suggestion.
In the extract
J
the Emigration Commissioners report
which was transmitted with
despatch, are explained the
grounds which render it necessary to forbid the
exemption of the
Chinese Emigration
to Australia and
California from the provisions of the Passengers Act. The
same reasons
appear to me to
forbid the exclusion of voyages the length of which is fixed by law at 45 days,
and
I consider
that the extreme limit has been
reached in adopting Council's
four
recommendation that voyages
not
60
the exempted
should be specified
by
name wis tead
of
being determines
by ageneral rule.
I am unable to agree in his suggestion,
In the extract
J
the Emigration.
Commifcorers reports
which was trans-
=mitted &
Sou
with
any Predecesor
despatch, are explained the
grounds which
ch
render & recepar to forbid the
exemption of the
Chinese
Chriese Emigration
to Australia and
California from the provisions of de passengers Act. The
Lame reasons
appear to me &
forbid the exclusio of voyages the lengt gwhich is fixed Glaw at 45-days,
and
I consider
chat the extreme
linch has been
reached in adopting douncils
Zour
recommendation that voyages
not
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.